Reading “The Silent Stage” really made me think, not so much about the use of giving students another imaginative creative outlet with which to express themselves, but more about how we interpret kids’ feelings. For one, I hope that everyone realizes that new students often go through the same stages as immigrant children and may need for us as teachers to help them adjust to their new surroundings. Also, I wonder if the author has a degree in psychiatry. While I’m not completely doubting that she was able read such subtleties in the students’ stories, I’m concerned that teachers may try to do the same thing and be completely off base. For example, sometimes a dog in a tutu is just that – a silly picture of a dog in a tutu. It does not mean that the student’s gay. I realize that the students were not completely capable or willing to openly communicate, but I would hate to read too much into something to the point that it creates the wrong impression of how the student really feels. Please proceed with caution!
On a completely different note, while reading the other two articles, it became blazingly obvious that I am not even remotely a techno-geek. Yes, I can type efficiently, produce documents when necessary using Word, pay my bills on-line, and download photos from my camera to the computer but that about sums up my use of technology. I did take all of the adult ed computer classes offered by MCCSC when my son first started school six years ago, but you lose is you don’t use it, and, really, I’ve not found it necessary to expand my personal use of all that’s out there. Therefore, I am very interested to learn about incorporating these new tools into the classroom because I do agree with Ms. Evans that students not only are more motivated when given the opportunity to use these tools but also will be expected to use them in the real world.
The whole multimodal thing has really piqued my interest. It makes me think of the book “The DaVinci Code”, which I had a hard time putting down while reading the original version, other than to Google the specific pieces of art referred to throughout the book. When the illustrated version came out, I was thrilled and bought that, too. How wonderful to have access to the pictures to help clarify the text! Then, sadly, the movie came out. I was not a fan. I feel that it completely omitted the suspense I felt while reading the book. It just felt rushed and empty to me. On the opposite end of the spectrum, I have a much easier time understanding concepts in P540: Learning and Cognition in Education when I watch the YouTube videos that Dr. Bonk suggests each week. They just seem to make more sense to me than the textbook does most of the time. There are so many ways to communicate, and it’s interesting to be going into such depth about it through these articles.